Web World
Africa can profit from fallow fibre
Contrary to popular belief, there is a lot of fibre lying fallow in Africa, and the right commercial models can make it viable to use this fibre to deploy better broadband services to people throughout the continent, says SUBEER RAMDHANI, head of product strategy at SEACOM.
African governments and incumbent operators have funded massive fibre infrastructure rollouts over the years. However, many of these projects are commercially unviable because the correct pricing and business models are not in place to entice carriers to use this infrastructure.
Governments, National Broadband initiatives and incumbents could make this infrastructure profitable and productive by adopting global best practices around selling the capacity to operators and service providers. This would result in better and cheaper broadband services, where private operators have little access to affordable metro and long-distance fibre. In many countries, we have seen private operators roll out their own networks in parallel to government-funded infrastructure because the commercial model offered by government just doesn’t make sense.
Taxpayers’ money is spent on underused infrastructure that private operators duplicate at great cost, a situation that keeps broadband prices higher than they need to be. There are a number of commercial business models used in Europe, the Americas and Asia that could help to unleash more fibre capacity in Africa and help bring broadband prices down in the process.
With dark fibre, operators can light up capacity as their requirements evolve. State owned enterprises must note that it is easier to be a company that provides dark fibre than one who tries to provide a suite of fully managed capacity services reliably. Operating the monitoring systems and maintenance organisations needed to deliver certain levels of uptime to carriers can be complex and costly, and private companies will always win the battle for skills.
Another key to tapping the potential of Africa’s fibre lies in changing the approach from leasing infrastructure to providing Indefeasible Right of Use (IRU) contracts to creditworthy carriers. This approach can relieve taxpayers’ of some the funding burden since an IRU typically ensures upfront payments but also ensures that the customer contributes to operating and maintenance costs in exchange for rights to use the capacity for the life of the fibre. These upfront payments can be used to fund expansion rather than solely relying on tax coffers.
Distance-based pricing can also help make much of Africa’s fibre more viable, Ramdhani says. Terrestrial pricing does not work the same as submarine pricing, and equal PoP to PoP pricing has resulted in higher pricing for short routes such as in metropolitan areas. Ironically, it is cheaper to build short routes which tend to carry more traffic. This dichotomy has resulted in operators replicating public infrastructure.
Below is an extract of information comparing dark fibre pricing across three key markets which shows that South Africa has a long way to go to catch up:
Country
Supplier Type
Infrastructure Type
Pricing Monthly
Kenya
Electricity Company
Overhead Dark Fibre
$40/pair/km/month
Kenya
Government Network
Underground Dark Fibre
$50/pair/km/month
Kenya
Private Provider
Underground Dark Fibre
$60/pair/km/month
Uganda
Electricity Network
Overhead Dark Fibre
$100/pair/km/month
Uganda
Government Network
Underground Dark Fibre
$90/pair/km/month
South Africa
Private Provider
Underground Dark Fibre – Rural
$100/pair/km/month
South Africa
Private Provider
Underground Dark Fibre Metro
$400/pair/km/month
South Africa
Electricity Provider
Overhead Dark Fibre
Not Available
South Africa
Government Network
Dark Fibre
Not Available
In many countries in southern and east Africa, an abundance of fibre is available, but it is frustratingly underused. However, we hope to see a larger number of national carriers and governments take more flexible approaches to commercial arrangements and pricing models that will drive greater efficiencies in fibre usage. This will be critical to improving broadband penetration and pricing in Africa.
*