Gadget

Changing the rules of fintech

A new story, laced with cliffhangers, drama and intrigue, is being written across the pages of the world’s financial newspapers. The plot does not include gangsters, espionage or murder – yet – but it has its readers riveted.

The story begins with the well-worn premise of how technology is changing the world of financial services. But it quickly hurtles into the heady world of startups that are rewriting the rules of this nascent industry called fintech, for financial technology. It then charges across the balance sheets of venture capital firms transfixed by unprecedented opportunity to return untold multiples on investments.

Depending who does the counting, anywhere from $17-billion to $25-billion in venture capital went to fintech firms globally in 2016. According to CBInsights, 2017 was the biggest year ever in fintech VC.

In South Africa, startups seem to pick up million-rand cheques on the basis of little more than PowerPoint presentations. Relatively young businesses that have already proven themselves are pulling in hundreds of millions.

Three examples from the past year encapsulate the scope of fintech and the scale of investment:

The last is the most intriguing of the three, given that it’s value and potential are not grounded in a specific trend or marketplace. With the cloud as backdrop, its innovation plays out in the fields of financial channels, blockchain, big data and artificial intelligence.

“We constantly review current technology trends and formulate products and solutions based on common industry needs using current and available technologies,” said Synthesis MD Michael Shapiro. “This is where our focus on cloud technologies was incubated and formulated five years ago.”

The combination of a 20-year track record and a fresh, startup-like approach to cloud computing, gave Synthesis a head-start in an environment where the starting point is often not clear. It assists financial institutions in “becoming cloud ready, to execute mass migrations, to harness the benefits of big-data analytics and to extract the cost savings and regulatory benefits of the cloud platforms,” said Shapiro.

“In the world of fintech, technical innovation and business innovation are often interchangeable – and we have to unlock this value. We translate the institution’s business strategy into solutions with real, measurable impact.”

Shapiro pointed to a fascinating twist in the plot, however: financial services companies that plan to disrupt themselves with their own, internal fintech start-ups.

“Cloud platforms such as AWS give new startups the opportunity to disrupt. That is why our customer base of established players is seriously evaluating and using the same technologies to up their game and provide better banking, insurance and investment solutions to the market.”

A striking example was First National Bank (FNB) last November awarding R10,5-million to employees in a contest to come up with innovations that would create radical disruption in the financial industry. The programme has been running since 2004, and has awarded a total of R54.5-million.

Last year FNB was named Most Innovative African Bank at the 2017 African FinTech Awards, for the second year in a row, as well as being named Master Innovator in the 2017 Accenture Innovation Awards.

FNB Business CIO Peter Alkema put the strategy simply: “Our aim is to disrupt rather than be disrupted. A new way of thinking is needed to demystify banking within the financial services industry.  Fintech helps grow, educate and enrich the market. We find that businesses are incorporating innovation in their business models which encourages us to think and act differently. This radical disruption is necessary for cross industry collaboration and is crucial for future value generation.”

However, investing in a fintech start-up is a very different process from incubating an idea in-house. For one thing, the team behind a startup hasn’t been recruited by the parent company. Yet, it has to fit in with the ethos and goals of the investor.

“The cultural fit of the team is critical,” said Bradley Sacks, joint CEO of Capital Appreciation. “A large component of any fintech company is its people, their entrepreneurial drive, their innovation and their understanding of the market opportunity their product or solution is trying to address. Ideological differences, be it in terms of architecture or otherwise, can be quite disruptive, and it is important to understand this as part of a due-diligence process.”

The bottom line, however, is the bottom line.

“The financial returns of any investment are obviously important, and we place a great deal of emphasis on this, including the benefit the acquisition may afford other initiatives we already have in the group. Our analysis does not only consider the direct impact within the quarter or half-year results, but also a medium-term horizon. Often the impact of innovative solutions is not visible until the solutions have reached critical mass adoption.”

This is probably the biggest conundrum in fintech investments: how to assess the potential of a solution before it has taken off, and before every other investor lines up to fund this potential. It is into this gap that many VC funding rounds have plunged and many promising fairy tales have ended in financial tragedy.

In many cases, the flaw in the story has been the belief in a good idea rather than a good business. But there is a formula to differentiate the two.

“The distinction between a good opportunity and a good idea is the viable economic application of the good idea,” said Sacks. “If the idea does not have a viable economic business case, it will never evolve into a real opportunity. Where clients derive value from an idea or application, they are happy to compensate us. Value to a client arises from the more traditional sources such as lower costs or increased revenue, but equally can arise from user experience, customer satisfaction and retention and brand awareness.”

Sacks and Alkema sound like they are reading from the same script. But that is probably because most good, new fintech stories still depend on the same tried and tested plots.

 

Exit mobile version